Business Feasibility Study: Should This Venture Proceed?
MyBreakEven | Published 5 November 2026 | Original fictional USD case
Edit the yellow fields, then print or save a completed copy. This file does not automatically calculate, store or submit answers.
| Test | Original case | Revision / evidence | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contribution | 180 | 210 at price 330 | Price acceptance unknown |
| Operating break-even | 30 | 5400 / 180 | Not owner-income target |
| Combined recovery | 50 | 43 at 210 contribution | Above original capacity |
| Capacity | 40 | 60 only if valid two-hour scope | Test quality and time |
| Funding gap | 2000 | 9000 need less 7000 committed | Resolve before launch |
| Overall decision | Revise | Confirm scope, demand and cash | No unconditional approval |
Your case
Business / period / evidence source / reviewer / decision / next review date
| Test | Original case | Revision / evidence | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contribution | Enter here | Enter here | Enter here |
| Operating break-even | Enter here | Enter here | Enter here |
| Combined recovery | Enter here | Enter here | Enter here |
| Capacity | Enter here | Enter here | Enter here |
| Funding gap | Enter here | Enter here | Enter here |
| Overall decision | Enter here | Enter here | Enter here |
Calculation and decision controls
Define the decision and the alternatives
Specify the offer, customer, delivery model, location where relevant, decision horizon and commitments under consideration. Include a smaller pilot or postponement as real alternatives. A study of “starting a business” is too broad to test supplier quotes, customer acceptance or the cash required before launch.
Decide in advance which evidence would change the answer. Separate confirmed facts from estimates and unknowns. Name the owner, date and source for important assumptions. Feasibility investigates whether the venture should proceed; the subsequent business plan develops how an accepted option will operate.
Test five connected forms of feasibility
| Area | Core question | Useful evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Market | Will the defined customer buy at this scope and price? | Paid pilot, buyer interviews and alternatives |
| Technical / operational | Can the team deliver the required quality and volume? | Timed process, supplier quotes and capacity |
| Organizational / requirements | Can the actual team operate within relevant obligations? | Competence, permissions and adviser checks |
| Economic | Does defined contribution cover the requirement? | Reconciled costs, price and scenarios |
| Funding / timing | Can commitments be paid when due? | Dated cash schedule and verified funding |
Passing one area does not pass the others. A popular product can fail a practical delivery test; a positive accounting result can still require more startup cash than is available. Obtain current specialist input for material location or activity requirements instead of copying a general statement that permits are “easy.”