Business Growth Strategies: Compare Contribution, Capacity and Cash

MyBreakEven | Published 5 November 2026 | Original fictional USD case

Edit the yellow fields, then print or save a completed copy. This file does not automatically calculate, store or submit answers.

Completed reference case
Decision driverBaselineGrowth caseEvidence / condition
Jobs100120Demand and conversion
Worker-hours200240220 current capacity
Revenue2000024000Same 200 price
Contribution1000012000100 job cost
Overhead600085002500 extra capacity
Result40003500Before omitted financing/tax
Pre-collection cashSeparate schedule5500Do not double-count expenses

Your case

Business / period / evidence source / reviewer / decision / next review date

Blank decision record
Decision driverBaselineGrowth caseEvidence / condition
JobsEnter hereEnter hereEnter here
Worker-hoursEnter hereEnter hereEnter here
RevenueEnter hereEnter hereEnter here
ContributionEnter hereEnter hereEnter here
OverheadEnter hereEnter hereEnter here
ResultEnter hereEnter hereEnter here
Pre-collection cashEnter hereEnter hereEnter here

Calculation and decision controls

Choose a growth mechanism before choosing a spending budget

Growth choices to test against actual evidence
OptionEvidence neededCost or constraint to test
Retain existing customersRepeat purchase and churn recordsSupport effort and retention incentives
Improve price or scopeBuyer acceptance and offer comparisonLost volume and delivery changes
Sell more through the current channelConversion and demand recordsAcquisition cost and practical capacity
Add a channel or segmentPilot with separately tracked economicsFees, returns and collections
Add an offer for existing buyersProblem and willingness-to-pay evidenceDevelopment, training and complexity
Increase delivery capacityVerified backlog and bottleneckFixed commitments and ramp-up cash

Compare options using the same period and cost boundary. A discount may increase orders while lowering total contribution. A new channel may bring demand but add commissions or slower settlement. Retention can reduce replacement selling effort, but it still needs a defined offer and service budget. Test the actual mechanism rather than applying a generic growth percentage.

Compare price, volume and capacity in one fictional business

Independent monthly cases; baseline price 200, job cost 100, overhead 6000
CaseJobs / priceRevenueContributionOverheadResult
Baseline100 / $200$20,000$10,000$6,000$4,000
Price +5%, same volume100 / $210$21,000$11,000$6,000$5,000
Volume +20%, same costs120 / $200$24,000$12,000$6,000$6,000
Volume +20%, new capacity cost120 / $200$24,000$12,000$8,500$3,500

Each job takes two worker-hours. Baseline work requires 200 hours; 120 jobs require 240. If practical capacity is 220, the simple volume case is infeasible without a resource or scope change. The last case assumes a specific $2,500 added monthly commitment and adequate capacity, showing a result below baseline despite higher sales. The price case assumes no volume loss solely to isolate the price effect; customer acceptance still needs evidence.