Depreciation Methods: Asset Cost, Useful Life and Profit Impact
Published by MyBreakeven. Editorial standards and corrections. Report a calculation or content issue to support@mybreakeven.com.
Compare straight-line, units-of-production and declining-balance depreciation using asset cost, residual value and life assumptions, with checked effects.

Depreciation allocates a depreciable asset’s cost over its estimated useful life under the reporting policy. Choose a method that reflects the expected consumption pattern; depreciation is not a direct estimate of market value or a cash reserve for replacement.
All amounts and operating results below are original fictional teaching examples in USD. They are not customer results, industry averages or forecasts. Use your own dated records and applicable accounting policies.
Define the asset and depreciable amount first
Start with supported capitalized cost, the date the asset is available for its intended use, useful life, residual value and the relevant consumption pattern. Distinguish repairs and period expenses from costs that meet capitalization requirements. Do not classify an item as an asset only because you prefer a smaller current expense.
The original example uses equipment with $14,000 capitalized cost, $2,000 estimated residual value and a five-year useful life. The depreciable amount is $12,000. The example assumes a full first year available for use, no impairment, revaluation, disposal or estimate change, and USD financial-reporting amounts. It is not a tax-depreciation election or industry life recommendation.
Compare methods on exactly the same starting asset
| Method | Year-one allocation | Closing carrying amount | Calculation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Straight line | $2,400 | $11,600 | 12,000 depreciable base / 5 years |
| Units of production | $3,000 | $11,000 | 12,000 / 60,000 units × 15,000 units |
| Double declining balance | $5,600 | $8,400 | 40% × 14,000 opening carrying amount |
Straight line allocates $2,400 in each full year under unchanged estimates. Units of production uses a selected total life output of 60,000 units and first-year output of 15,000: $12,000 / 60,000 × 15,000 = $3,000. The 40% double-declining rate is twice the five-year straight-line rate and applies to opening carrying amount. Residual value is enforced as a floor; it is not subtracted again before applying that rate.
Do not add the three charges. They are alternative methods for the same asset. Their different first-year amounts reflect different assumed consumption patterns, not three separate costs to post.
Test whether the method fits the consumption evidence
A reasonably even time-based consumption pattern may support straight line. A measurable usage relationship may support units of production when output records and lifetime capacity estimates are credible. A declining pattern requires support for higher earlier consumption; choosing it only to lower reported profit is not a method-selection argument.
For the declining-balance illustration, full-year charges are $5,600, $3,360, $2,016, $1,024 and $0 after capping at the $2,000 residual. Total allocation is $12,000. The fourth year’s uncapped 40% amount would exceed the remaining depreciable amount, so it is limited. Another documented policy might switch methods; this schedule assumes no switch.
Separate expense, inventory, cash and carrying amount
If revenue before depreciation is $30,000 and other included period expenses are $20,000, the pre-depreciation result is $10,000. Treating all depreciation as a period expense in this simplified service case gives results of $7,600, $7,000 or $4,400 under the three alternatives. The asset acquisition cash payment is the same $14,000 in all three cases; the allocation itself does not pay another $2,400, $3,000 or $5,600.
In production settings, depreciation can enter manufacturing overhead and inventory before reaching cost of goods sold. Do not force every asset’s depreciation into a separate current OPEX line. Reconcile the actual capitalization and expense policy. The COGS guide retains its cost boundary.
Maintain estimates and keep the specialist schedules separate
Document the selected method, estimate evidence, reviewer and effective date. Review a change in expected life, residual amount or use under the relevant accounting framework; do not erase prior history or call every revision an error. Impairment and disposal are different questions and can change the carrying amount outside ordinary depreciation.
Use the straight-line tutorial for partial periods and a complete dated schedule. Use the accumulated-depreciation rollforward for balances and asset removals. The accounting cycle shows where supported adjustments enter statements. Tax deductions, bonus depreciation and section 179 require separate current tax guidance and are outside this financial-reporting illustration.
Download the editable worksheet
Download the printable HTML worksheet. It contains the completed case and a separate blank working record. It does not calculate automatically. Edit in your browser, then print or save a completed copy before closing; your edits are not sent to MyBreakeven.
Sources and scope
Primary references below support the stated definitions or framework. The worked case, numbers and decision records are original MyBreakeven material. Reviewed November 7, 2026; no external professional sign-off is claimed.
Frequently asked questions
Does depreciation measure market value?
No. It allocates cost under a reporting policy. Market valuation and impairment are separate analyses.
Can I post all three methods together?
No. The table compares alternatives for one asset.
Does depreciation create replacement cash?
No. The noncash allocation does not fund a bank account.
Are these useful lives or tax rates recommended for my business?
No. They are fictional assumptions; actual reporting and tax treatment need their own evidence.
Browse the MyBreakeven blog hub for related planning guides.
Planning estimates only—not accounting, tax, legal or lending advice.